Kluwer: The Law Governing the Effects of Insolvency in Arbitration: Is UNCITRAL Getting it Wrong? – Part II

Published on November 26, 2024

By Manuel Penades (King's College London)

Building on Part I of this post, Part II explains the serious practical disfunctions that would derive from the adoption by Working Group V (“WG V”) at UNCITRAL of the current proposal to subject all the effects of insolvency in arbitration to the law of the State in which insolvency proceedings have been opened (the...

Continue reading
Continue reading on website
Other news

SCC: How is the SCC Arbitration Institute's role in international arbitration viewed around the world?   Aigoul Kenjebayeva, a Par...

November 25, 2024
How is the SCC Arbitration Institute's role in international arbitration viewed around the world? Aigoul Kenjebayeva, a Partner at Dentons in Almaty, Kazakhstan, shares insights into arbitration in Kazakhstan and the SCC Arbitration Institute's role in promoting arbitration as an efficient and reliable in today’s international commercial and investment landscape.

Kluwer: The Law Governing the Effects of Insolvency in Arbitration: Is UNCITRAL Getting it Wrong? – Part I

November 26, 2024
By Manuel Penades (King's College London)Since 2019, Working Group (“WG”) V of UNCITRAL has been working on the adoption of a choice of law instrument that regulates the law applicable to the international effects of insolvency proceedings. The project seeks to include a rule on the law governing the impact of insolvency in arbitration. Part I of this post examines... Continue reading