
SCC: ๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐: ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐๐ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐. ๐๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ป ย Dissenting opinions in commercial arbitration are no longer th...
Published on October 13, 2025
๐ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐: ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐๐ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ ๐. ๐๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ป
Dissenting opinions in commercial arbitration are no longer the rarity they once were. As confidentiality norms evolve and awards are increasingly reported, arbitrators are more frequently expressing divergent views.
In our latest ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐น๐ธ, experienced arbitrator Anne K. Hoffmann shares her reflections on this development. Key insights from the interview:
โข Dissenting opinions are not problematic and, in fact, can be valuable for a number of reasons.
โข Strategies that could be employed to prevent or manage dissenting opinions.
โข How dissenting opinions should be handled with regard to confidentiality of the arbitral tribunalโs deliberations.
Hoffmannโs insights offer practical guidance for tribunals navigating disagreement, highlighting how differing views can enhance both the reasoning and credibility of arbitral awards.
๐ Read the full interview: https://lnkd.in/dFZqbM3t
