SCC: ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ: ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€ "๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป" ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†? ย  As geopolitical tensions...

Published on August 11, 2026
๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ: ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€ "๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป" ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†?   As geopolitical tensions reshape the international arbitration landscape, parties are scrutinising arbitrators' backgrounds more closely than ever, and social media has become a primary hunting ground.    In a new article for Kluwer Arbitration Blog, our Legal Counsel Emma Garrett and Yi Ting Sam, together with former SCC Visiting Professional Lexie Gao (้ซ˜ๅ€ฉ), build on our November 2025 Practice Note on arbitrator challenge decisions (2020โ€“2024) by adding four previously unpublished cases from January 2025 to June 2026. Together, the eight decisions examined offer a consolidated view of how the SCC Board approaches challenges grounded in political opinion.   Three factors consistently shape the Board's analysis: ๐Ÿ”น ๐—”๐˜๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป โ€” a law firm's or chambers' political stance is not automatically attributed to an individual arbitrator; to date, no challenge based on firm-level conductโ€ฆ