
SCC: ๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ, ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐. On the surface, arbitrating with a sta...
Published on June 17, 2026
๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ, ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐.
On the surface, arbitrating with a state entity can look much like any other international arbitration. The core principles are familiar but the realities, from complex approval chains and non-signatory involvement to the ever-present question of sovereign immunity, are very different. For those who are new to it, the real surprises often come after the award is rendered.
In our latest SCC Spotlight Talk, we sit down with Ioana Knoll-Tudor, Member of the SCC Board, to explore the practical realities of arbitrating with state entities and why enforcement is so often where the true battle begins.
Ioana shares her insights on:
โข Why state-entity arbitrations tend to be more complex than purely commercial disputes.
โข How state entities that never signed the arbitration agreement can find themselves drawn into proceedings, and what arbitral tribunals look for when assessing whether thatโฆ
