SCC: ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ? A new piece publ...

Published on April 29, 2026
๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ? A new piece published on Kluwer Arbitration Blog explores exactly this question, comparing two emerging models: the SCC Express Dispute Assessment, grounded in institutional rules and human-neutral evaluation, and the AAA's AI Resolution Simulator, launched in March 2026. Authored by SCC Legal Counsel Emma Garrett and SCC Visiting Professional Lexie Gao, the article maps the fundamental design differences between these two approaches and what they mean for practitioners navigating early dispute resolution. Three key takeaways:  โ€ข ๐—•๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€. SCC Express requires the agreement of all parties, ensuring procedural equality and lending the assessment greater legitimacy, with a clear pathway to binding effect.  โ€ข ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜† ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ-๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ. Whilst AI-powered tools offer speed and accessibility, questions around bias,โ€ฆ